J Med Cases
Journal of Medical Cases, ISSN 1923-4155 print, 1923-4163 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Med Cases and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://www.journalmc.org

Case Report

Volume 12, Number 2, February 2021, pages 61-64

Corynebacterium striatum Cardiac Device-Related Infective Endocarditis: The First Case Report in a Patient With a Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator Device and Review of the Literature

Luisa Serpa Pintoa, c, Andre Dias Friasb, Margarida Francaa

aInternal Medicine Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitario do Porto, Porto, Portugal
bCardiology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitario do Porto, Porto, Portugal
cCorresponding Author: Luisa Serpa Pinto, Internal Medicine Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitario do Porto, Largo do Prof. Abel Salazar, 4099-001 Porto, Portugal

Manuscript submitted November 4, 2020, accepted November 11, 2020, published online December 30, 2020
Short title: Corynebacterium striatum CDRIE
doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jmc3618


Corynebacterium striatum (C. striatum) is a skin commensal agent, rarely described as a cause of infective endocarditis. We describe a case of a 48-year-old man, with multiple comorbidities with cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) device implanted 1 year before. A cardiac device-related infective endocarditis (CDRIE) due to C. striatum, with vegetations in the tricuspid valve adjacent to the electrode lead and concomitant lumbar spondylodiscitis were diagnosed. The patient was treated initially with a 6-week course of vancomycin with sterile blood cultures and reduction of inflammatory parameters. Surgery was refused at this stage. Six weeks later, he was readmitted due to C. striatum bacteriemia recurrence, with vegetations adhering to the electrode wire, being treated with daptomycin 10mg/kg body weight, after presenting renal toxicity to vancomycin. CRT-D device was removed with implantation of epicardial cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker (CRT-P). To our knowledge, this might be the first description of C. striatum CDRIE in a patient with a CRT-D. In the five cases described in the literature of CDRIE by this agent, early removal of the pacemaker was performed with good results. In this case, the device was removed only after failure of medical treatment alone.

Keywords: Infective endocarditis; Corynebacterium striatum; Cardiac device-related infective endocarditis; Cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator; Implantable cardioverter defibrillator; Daptomycin


Corynebacterium striatum (C. striatum) is an aerobic and optional anaerobic gram-positive bacillus, commensal from the skin. In the last decades C. striatum is becoming an emerging agent, a multidrug-resistant pathogen with the capacity to form biofilms that can cause infection of endovascular devices [1].

Cardiac device-related infective endocarditis (CDRIE) is defined as an infection extending to the electrode leads, cardiac valve leaflets, or endocardial surface that can result either from pocket infection extending to intracardiac electrodes, or any portion of the device may become infected due to secondary bacteremia resulting in the formation of vegetations. The latter can be found anywhere from the insertion vein to the superior vena cava, on the lead, tricuspid valve, in the right atrial or ventricular endocardium [2]. The presence of infective material along the lead course may not provide typical vegetations of measurable size so that normal transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) do not rule out CDRIE [2]. Treatment includes both prolonged antibiotic therapy associated with complete hardware removal [2]. Corynebacterium spp. is rarely identified as a pathogen in CDRIE infection [2]. A literature search in PubMed revealed only five case reports of C. striatum CDRIE [3-7]. Although an increased risk of CDRIE has been described in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators compared with permanent pacemakers [2], all cases described in the literature refer to pacemaker patients, this case being the first case description of CDRIE by C. striatum in a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) patient. On the other hand, in all cases described in the literature [3-7], the pacemaker was removed in the first inpatient days, with a good outcome despite the patient’s age and comorbidities. In this case, due to the patient’s poor performance status and comorbidities, the surgical intervention was refused at first. The patient was managed with medical treatment only, but despite clinical improvement, he had recurrence of the infection a few weeks later. The device was removed only on the second CDRIE by the same agent with a good outcome despite the patient’s overall condition.

Case Report▴Top 

We present the case of a diabetic 48-year-old man with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, associated with heart failure with severely reduced ejection fraction, complete heart block (CHB), and permanent atrial fibrillation. The patient had a past cardioembolic stroke with left hemiparesis and had a record of recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs) associated with suprapubic cystostomy due to urethral stenosis. A CRT-D generator (Quadra Assura MP St Jude Medical) was implanted the year before due to CHB with a single lead pacing cardioverter-defibrillator implanted (ICD), due to QRS < 120 ms and high probability of widening in the near future.

One month earlier he was admitted in the emergency department (ED) for fever and low back pain, being discharged with a UTI diagnosis and ciprofloxacin.

Again, he was admitted in the ED with fever, severe low back pain, anorexia, and weight loss. On physical examination, fever (39.1 °C), painful palpation of the lumbar spinal apophysis, and absent cardiac audible murmur, or cutaneous embolic phenomena were remarked. Electrocardiography showed atrial fibrillation with complete left bundle branch block with QRS > 150 ms, and TTE was unremarkable for the presence of vegetations. Prior blood cultures (BC) identified C. striatum, with sensitivity to tetracycline and vancomycin, and resistance to gentamicin, clindamycin, ciprofloxacin, and penicillin G; so did a new pair of BC with the same sensitivity profile. Vancomycin therapy was initiated. BC collected on the second day of antibiotic was sterile. Ten days after admission TEE showed vegetation at the auricular face of the tricuspid valve, in the posterior leaflet, +/- 6 mm, heterogeneous contours, with two mobile projections with +/- 6 mm, with no apparent device lead involvement (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.
Click for large image
Figure 1. Transesophageal echocardiogram showing the vegetation adherent to the posterior leaflet of tricuspid valve. This exam was unremarkable for fibrin-sheath, masses or vegetations adherent to the electrocatheter.

Lumbar computed tomography (CT) scan showed irregularities in the L1 - L2 vertebral platforms, which were absent in the previous examination, 1 month earlier. Due to the incompatibility of the CRT-D device, it was not possible to perform magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, a lumbar spondylodiscitis diagnosis was presumed.

TEE was repeated (day 29) in the fourth week of vancomycin therapy, similar to the previous one namely regarding the presence of vegetation. Surgical removal of the CRT-D device was proposed, but the patient was considered as having a very high overall surgical risk. So he was managed with medical treatment alone. He was discharged after completing 49 days of vancomycin, with clinical resolution and serial negative blood cultures.

Again, 42 days after hospital discharge, the patient was readmitted, in cardiogenic shock, with respiratory failure, acute kidney injury, and ischemic hepatitis requiring dobutamine. As soon as dysfunctions improved he was transferred to our nursery. Again, BC showed the presence of C. striatum, with the same sensitivity profile and presumptively sensitive to daptomycin (minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) = 0.023 µg/mL). Neither TTE at admission nor TEE performed 5 days after, showed cardiac vegetation. Vancomycin was started (day 3), requiring several adjustments due to frequent toxic levels. The patient developed acute kidney injury (day 12) suspecting renal toxicity due to vancomycin; and therapy was changed to daptomycin10 mg/kg. A systolic murmur not present at admission was noticed (day12), and TTE was repeated with evidence of vegetations adhering to the device lead in its auricular path near the tricuspid valve (Fig. 2). Daptomycin therapy was continued without new febrile events or elevated inflammatory markers, and with sterile serial BC. On the 81st day of daptomycin (inpatient day 93), the patient underwent surgical intervention with the removal of CRT-D and implantation of a cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker (CRT-P) (Quadra Allure MPP St Jude Medical), with epicardial electrodes and the device placed in an abdominal loca. ICD was not implanted due to the absence of therapies in the past, in addition to frailty and life expectancy < 1 year. Electrode tips were sterile. He completed 15 days of daptomycin after the intervention. No evidence of recurrence of infection was found in follow-up consultation 6 months after discharge.

Figure 2.
Click for large image
Figure 2. Parasternal short-axis mitral valve unconventional view displaying de novo fibrin-sheath involving the electrocatheter with an additional punctiform image.

Although C. striatum is commensal from the skin, it is becoming an emerging infectious agent, a multidrug-resistant pathogen with the capacity to form biofilms [1]. In the presence of bacteriemia and cardiac devices, CDRIE should be suspected even in the absence of typical vegetations in the TTE and TEE [2]. The treatment combines prolonged antibiotic therapy and device removal [2].

Corynebacterium spp. is rarely identified as a pathogen in infective endocarditis [2], and there are only five case reports of C. striatum CDRIE whose characteristics are summarized in Table 1 [3-7]. Most of them (4/5) were treated with vancomycin and all of them with device removal within the first inpatient days. In the case of our patient, despite the assumption of resolution of the bacteremia, clinical improvement, and a 6 weeks course of antibiotics, on the first hospitalization, the infection was not resolved with medical treatment alone with recurrence of bacteremia imposing the withdrawal of CRT-D despite the high surgical risk.

Table 1.
Click to view
Table 1. Literature Review of Case Reports of Corynebacterium striatum Cardiac Device-Related Infective Endocarditis

Regarding medical treatment, daptomycin 10 mg/kg body weight for 6 weeks was successfully used in one case described by Guerrero et al [6], in which spondylodiscitis also coexisted, as in the case of our patient.

It should be noted that only in one of the described cases, vegetations were detected in the TTE, being the TEE necessary to confirm the diagnosis in most cases. Since C. striatum is a pathogen capable of forming biofilms, in the presence of bacteremia and endovascular devices, the suspicion for infection should be high and the diagnosis must be pursued, as shown by Szymanska et al [7].

This case demonstrates that in the presence of CDRIE the removal of the device is fundamental to treatment’s success and must be pursued to control infection source. On the other hand, it shows that daptomycin is a suitable option for the treatment of infective endocarditis by this pathogen.


None to declare.

Financial Disclosure

None to declare.

Conflict of Interest

None to declare.

Informed Consent

Both written and verbal informed consents were obtained from the patient for publication of this case report.

Author Contributions

LSP collected the case data, wrote the manuscript, and prepared the table; ADF collected the case data, prepared the pictures, and wrote the manuscript; MF collected the case data and revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final version to be published.

Data Availability

The authors declare that data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

  1. McMullen AR, Anderson N, Wallace MA, Shupe A, Burnham CA. When good bugs go bad: epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Corynebacterium striatum, an emerging multidrug-resistant, opportunistic pathogen. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61(11):e01111-17.
    doi pubmed
  2. Habib G, Lancellotti P, Antunes MJ, Bongiorni MG, Casalta JP, Del Zotti F, Dulgheru R, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis: The Task Force for the Management of Infective Endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM). Eur Heart J. 2015;36(44):3075-3128.
    doi pubmed
  3. Melero-Bascones M, Munoz P, Rodriguez-Creixems M, Bouza E. Corynebacterium striatum: an undescribed agent of pacemaker-related endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;22(3):576-577.
    doi pubmed
  4. Oliva A, Belvisi V, Iannetta M, Andreoni C, Mascellino MT, Lichtner M, Vullo V, et al. Pacemaker lead endocarditis due to multidrug-resistant Corynebacterium striatum detected with sonication of the device. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(12):4669-4671.
    doi pubmed
  5. Abi R, Ez-Zahraouii K, Ghazouani M, Zohoun A, Kheyi J, Chaib A, Elouennass M. [A Corynebacterium striatum endocarditis on a carrier of pacemaker]. Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2012;70(3):329-331.
    doi pubmed
  6. Fernandez Guerrero ML, Molins A, Rey M, Romero J, Gadea I. Multidrug-resistant Corynebacterium striatum endocarditis successfully treated with daptomycin. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012;40(4):373-374.
    doi pubmed
  7. Szymanska UA, Kobylecka M, Rosiak M, Ziemba A, Krolicki L, Kosior DA. All that glitters is not gold: positron emission tomography/computed tomography detection failure in a patient with implanted pacemaker and relapsing Corynebacterium striatum sepsis. Kardiol Pol. 2018;76(12):1741.
    doi pubmed

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Journal of Medical Cases is published by Elmer Press Inc.


Browse  Journals  


Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics


World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology


Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity


Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research


Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics



Journal of Medical Cases, monthly, ISSN 1923-4155 (print), 1923-4163 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)

This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.journalmc.org   editorial contact: editor@journalmc.org
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.