|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
| Case Report | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
| Volume 2, Number 4, August 2011, pages 139-142 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Rapidly Progressive
Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease VV1 Subtype
Anuradha
Kollurua,
b,
Alberto M. Jacira, Mamta Sharmaa,
aSt.
John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA
Manuscript accepted for publication
May 25, 2011
Abstract
Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) is
rare transmissible spongiform encephalopathy caused by abnormal,
host-encoded prion proteins that accumulate in the central nervous
tissue. CJD
occurs in 3 forms: sporadic, familial and
acquired (iatrogenic and variant). Six different molecular subtypes (MM1,
MM2,
MV1,
MV2,
VV1, and
VV2) of sporadic CJD (sCJD) have been identified by genotype
at codon 129. The
VV1 type represents one of the rarest subtypes. In contrast
to the classic sCJD types, these patients are characterized by young
age at onset, and slowly progressive dementia. Our case illustrates
that sCJD
VV1 subtype can have a rapid progression. A 50 year old
Caucasian presented with memory loss and personality changes.
Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain showed increased signal
intensity in the grey mater of cerebral cortex. Brain biopsy
confirmed the diagnosis of sCJD
VV1 subtype. Currently there is no effective treatment and
patient succumbed to death within 3 months of presentation. Keywords: Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease; Prion diseases; Memory loss
Introduction
Prion
diseases are a rare group of progressive neurodegenerative disorders
with fatal outcome.
Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) is the most
common type of the prion diseases. Its annual incidence worldwide is
approximately 1 case per 1 million persons, with the United States
reporting less than 300 cases per year [1].
The following case describes a 50-year-old female with rapidly
progressive cognitive and motor deficits with temporal lobe
biopsy proven diagnosis of a rare subtype of sporadic CJD (sCJD)
VV1. This case illustrates that sCJD
VV1 subtype can have a rapid progression compared to prior
descriptions [2]. Case Presentation A 50-year-old female had been in her usual state of health until approximately 3 months prior to hospital admission. During that time, family members had noticed episodic states of confusion and a "dazed" state of consciousness that waxed and waned. These cognitive symptoms were persistent and worsened during the following 4 weeks, during which the patient also developed a left hand tremor that increased with intentional movement, increasing states of confusion, bradypsychia (slowed mental process), slurred speech and shortened attention span. The patient’s condition worsened by the 6th week of initial presentation with memory loss characterized by failure to recall social security number, internet passwords, and accounting responsibilities, such as balancing check books. During this period the patient’s family members also began to notice an expressive aphasia with slurred speech, broken words and incomplete word pronunciations. By the end of the 8th week, the patient was unable to complete household chores, had a decreased appetite, and developed left lower extremity weakness with a broad-step gait and bradykinesia (slow motor movement). By the 12th week from the first onset of symptoms, the woman had an equally degenerative progression of psychomotor and cognitive functions characterized by clumsiness, motor discoordination, lack of hand-eye and alternating hand coordination, left hand tremor and left lower extremity weakness, progressively shortened attention span, loss of short-term memory and poor recall capabilities. At this point the patient was hospitalized complaining of left sided paresis affecting posture, severe dysarthria, bradypsychia, bradycinesia and altered mental status. The patient’s past medical history was significant for Hodgkin’s lymphoma, for which she received blood transfusion during the course of disease and was treated with MOPP (Mustargen, Oncovin, Procarbazine and Prednisone) and radiation therapy fifteen years ago. There was no history of smoking, alcohol abuse or any illicit drug abuse. Her family history was not significant for any prion disease.
She had
traveled to England 20 years back and was a nurse by profession.
On
neurological examination
patient had expressive aphasia, and impaired memory. She had
increase tone on the left side with normal reflexes. Cranial nerves
were intact. All laboratory results were normal, including blood
cell counts, metabolic panel, thyroid functions, antinuclear
antibodies, rheumatoid factor, syphilis serology, and
HIV test. Cerebrospinal fluid evaluation (CSF) was normal,
though it was not evaluated for
protein 14-3-3. Electroencephalograph (EEG) demonstrated
frontal intermittent rhythmic delta waves suggestive of
encephalopathy, an EEG performed two weeks back was normal. Magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain showed increased signal
intensity in the grey mater of cerebral cortex, which was seen best
on the diffusion-weighted images. No mass was seen in the deep
thalamus, basal ganglia or brainstem
(Fig. 1).
Prion diseases are a rare group of progressive neurodegenerative disorders with fatal outcome. In humans it includes CJD, Gerstmann-Straussler-Scheinker disease (GSS), fatal familial insomnia (FFI) and kuru. Each type contains their own unique mechanism of pathogenesis with associated clinical and diagnostic features. The link between each of these prion diseases is the presence of prion protein (PrP) amyloid plaques. These plaques are the result of the conversion of a normal cellular protein PrPc into an abnormal protease resistant isoform [3]. This occurs when the native protein folds in an abnormal fashion, exponentially converting adjacent proteins with a “domino-like” effect, resulting in amyloid plaque formations and structurally damaged neuronal tissue. Neuronal loss, proliferation of glial cells, absence of an inflammatory response and the presence of small vacuoles produce the characteristic spongiform appearance resulting in the common reference of these diseases as the “spongiform encephalopathies”. The prognosis is grim with rapid neurologic decline, ultimately resulting in death within a relatively short period of time. CJD is the most common of the prion diseases. There are three recognized types: sCJD, familial CJD (fCJD) and acquired {iatrogenic CJD (iCJD) and variant CJD(vCJD)}. Its annual incidence worldwide has steadily hovered around one case per 1 million persons per year, with the United States reporting less than 300 cases per year [1]. Approximately 85% of cases of CJD are sporadic, 5-15% being fCJD and less than 1% iCJD. In 2007, 254 cases were referred to the National Prion Disease Pathology Surveillance Center. Of these, 65 were diagnosed as the sCJD [4]. Researchers have attempted to identify potential risk factors for sCJD. One study in Australia suggested that a history of multiple surgical procedures and residence for more than 10 years on a farm were significant risk factors for sCJD [5]. Another series of studies suggested that a family history of CJD, adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 19.1 or medical history of psychosis (OR = 9.9) were the only significant factors associated with disease [6]. In regards to this case, none of the studies reviewed documented an increased risk of sCJD with receipt of blood products. Clinical phenotypes of sCJD have been associated with molecular subtypes determined by the PRNP gene codon 129 genotype and the pathologic prion protein (PrPSc) type. The PRNP genotype is homozygous or heterozygous for methionine (M) or valine (V) at codon 129. Using this molecular classification, six clinical phenotypes of sCJD have been described: MM1, MV1, VV2, MV2, MM2 and VV1 [7]. MM1 and MV1 account for about 70% of cases, VV2 for 15%, MV2 for 9%, MM2 for 4% and VV1 for 1%. This case describes a patient with VV1 and represents one of the rarest subtypes [8]. Unlike the typical presentation of the common sCJD types, VV1 patients are characterized by young age of onset, long disease duration and slowly progressive dementia [2]. In contrast to the observations by Meissner et al. [2], this patient presented with rapidly progressive dementia, upper left extremity and postural ataxia with abbreviated disease duration. This case illustrates that sCJD VV1 subtype can have a rapid progression. The clinical diagnosis can be supported by 14-3-3 in CSF, MRI finding, and confirmed by genetic and molecular analysis. Currently there is no effective treatment for this fatal neurodegenerative disorder. Primary care physicians are at the forefront of preventing, diagnosing and treating illnesses encountered in the outpatient setting. Referral to subspecialists is appropriate when they are unable to manage certain conditions. The purpose of our training is to not only diagnose and treat disease, but also to address the social, psychological and family dynamics that the illness may cause. The case presented in this paper was written to describe the clinical progression of this rapid evolving encephalopathy, resulting in dementia and gross deterioration of both cognitive and motor functions. The pathology of CJD and its diffuse involvement of the grey matter (as witnessed on MRI) shows how a previously healthy patient develops a constellation of symptoms that progress simultaneously, translating into a substantial and exponential insult to the central nervous system. It is important to keep this “diagnosis of exclusion” within the differential diagnosis when confronted with a case of rapid progressive dementia affecting of both cognitive and motor functions. A primary care physician encountering such a case in the office setting should consider a prompt work-up and consultation as necessary. These rare diagnoses give them an opportunity to design strategies to council the patient and family members as well as to more efficiently manage end of life issues and care for the patient and their significant others. It is of the utmost importance for the patient’s admitting physician to translate the tremendous and often overwhelming amount of information, in a comprehensible and empathetic fashion: the communication being open to the patient and supportive of the family members concerns. Conflict of interest: No sources of support and no disclaimers. |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
| References | |||||||
| 1. |
CJD
(Creutzfeldt - Jakob disease, Classic). [Medline] |
| 2. |
Meissner
B, Westner IM, Kallenberg K, Krasnianski A, Bartl M, Varges D, Bosenberg
C, et al. Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: clinical and diagnostic
characteristics of the rare VV1 type. Neurology. 2005;65(10):1544-1550.
[Medline] [CrossRef] |
| 3. |
DeArmond
SJ, Prusiner SB. Etiology and pathogenesis of prion diseases. Am J
Pathol. 1995;146(4):785-811. [Medline] |
| 4. | National Prion Disease Pathology Surveillance Center Cases Examined (NDPDSC). October, 2007 |
| 5. |
Collins
S, Law MG, Fletcher A, Boyd A, Kaldor J, Masters CL. Surgical treatment
and risk of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: a case-control study.
Lancet. 1999;353(9154):693-697. [Medline] [CrossRef] |
| 6. |
Wientjens
DP, Davanipour Z, Hofman A, Kondo K, Matthews WB, Will RG, van Duijn CM.
Risk factors for Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: a reanalysis
of case-control studies. Neurology. 1996;46(5):1287-1291. [Medline] |
| 7. |
Parchi P,
Castellani R, Capellari S, Ghetti B, Young K, Chen SG, Farlow M, et al.
Molecular basis of phenotypic variability in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob
disease.
Ann Neurol.
1996;39(6):767-778. [Medline] [CrossRef] |
| 8. | Ireland, R. Distinguishing VV1 sporadic CJD from variant CJD. Nature Clinical Practice Neurology 2006; 2:64-65. |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):10.4021/jmc221w
About
DOI and
CrossRef
Journal of Medical Cases is a member of CrossRef.



